Thank-you, Toonie, for reaching out to try and help in whatever way you can. No, I wasn't born when those songs were first popular, but I'm still more than familiar with them, seeing as they're classics and were popularized in famous movies which are still shown today. I grew up with the Beatles, however, though I was young, and they remain my favourite band of all time. Funnily, that first song has been going through my head lately, too. (mind you, Idol has had something to do with it, with their Beatles theme of the last 2 wks.)
You're close, about where at least some of my interests lie, but while I can be a creative 'artist' in my own ways, I'm not in the field per se. That's where my landscaping talents came from, though. I just don't have any interest in it right now and have preferred to pursue my desires in the "helping" fields instead.
Ha! I almost had to laugh at your assessment of me - yes, a strong individualist, yet terribly sensitive at the same time....when you put these two things side-by-side, it becomes even easier to see how that makes my life and feelings so difficult to work with, as they often can be diametrically-opposed in some ways. But at the same time, I need one in order to lend balance to the other, so I suppose it works in its own way. One lends strength to the other, in other words - not a bad 'system', but painful, to be sure.
I do already know and love the two quotes at the beginning of that article. And while I can really appreciate the 'spirit' of the whole article, in some ways I've already picked it to shreds

and feel it's not as informative or comprehensive as many of the things I've already learned, or learned OF, second-hand. So I couldn't help but disagree, sometimes quite strongly, with what was presented. I saw some contradictions, but more importantly perhaps, is that much of it doesn't seem to agree with people's actual
experiences with dying and then not remaining there, for whatever reasons they were not supposed to, or in being allowed to return here in short order. Nor does it seem to agree with what most mediums have gotten from those consciouses they've been able to contact. Most pointedly, these ideas don't really jibe with what the animals themselves have imparted to communicators either (generally-speaking), at least about the dimensions most of
them seem to inhabit, or about how WE, the remaining, can BE during our mourning. Too much of it seemed rooted in fears, of how we affect them....and I just don't buy that perspective. It takes away permission for us to mourn as we need to and returns it to fear.....a construct we ALL need diminish in ourselves as much as possible if we are to evolve beyond where we've been stuck for so long.
In particular, I found it extremely upsetting, actually, to read their opinions (they claim "facts") of how "The sensualist still palpitates with cravings that can never now be satisfied." That's like saying when we reunite with our babies, we will never be able to hold them and feel their fur or feathers again. Might as well just exchange one 'hell' for another then, I say! I've even asked one fellow I know who clinically died and actually
argued his way back to this plane (for the sake of his human children's lives here) about this sort of thing, and he has assured me that while we ARE in our essence energetic beings w/o bodies (and recognize the energetic patterns of our loved ones, as they do ours), we CAN also choose to re-experience those things of an earthly plane's nature when we want.....even "there." We don't necessarily NEED to, but we CAN. Interestingly, this jibes with what many animals have told their loved ones (through communicators). So as is my bent, I prefer to believe more strongly the ones who've actually been exposed to the process of physical death (and beyond), as well as those who have remained in the spiritual world(s), most especially the purer animals, who always had less attachment to the physical in the first place and so are more able to ascend to higher vibrational planes.
I also can't buy the statement that "but they do not hear the words we say, nor are they conscious in detail of our physical actions." If that were really so, then Sabin would not have been able to break through the veil and claw the carpet in his favourite closet at the exact moment Nissa and I were available to clearly, distinctly and needs-be hear it.....and I flatly NEVER believe in "coincidence" anymore, so that's not even a possible consideration, in my mind. As well, then mediums who are shown post-death family activities they could not have possibly known about, by the spirits they are in contact with, must be all wrong about their 'data.' How could the spirits pass along info. about such earthly events, if they're not able to see them? They might not
dwell on most of them, but I believe they certainly CAN see them, especially if they're events that are important to US, their loved ones. So nope, don't buy that.
They also said "if he is strong enough and wise enough to dominate those earthly cravings and to raise himself entirely above them" and "...but also relieves the departed parent from anxiety and helps him on his upward path." And yet, most who've had experiences of physical death (but ended up coming back here) say they IMMEDIATELY felt no worries or yearning for those who remained, even for their own children, despite feeling totally panicked about these same matters
as they were dying. No, instead, as SOON as they were relieved of the physical body, their atti*tude and feelings were relieved as well. There was no having to overcome these feelings - they simply fell away, along with their body.
The same goes for this statement of "fact." - "...nor is he suddenly endowed with all the wisdom of the ages. He is just the same man after his death as he was the day before it, with the same emotions, the same dispositions, the same intellectual development." On TWO levels, this can't be right. One, even on the
earthly plane, we are no more the exact, same person we were yesterday, and certainly, as we are after a loss. We can change dramatically and indeed are
meant to, as part of our evolution.
And two, once again I'd point to those who've gone and returned with either emphatic knowledge, OR have recollections of having experienced being shown "the wisdom of the ages", but couldn't or weren't allowed to retain it (or not all of it, but only important generalities) upon re-arrival back here.
However, notably, the residual effects of having HAD that knowledge remains with them in their earthly lives. Hence, total release of the fear of physical death and an unshakable conviction in the peace and wisdom/knowledge of what they, and all of us, will return to after 'death.' So MANY have returned here to assure us
with that total conviction, that absolutely EVERYTHING has a universal, infinitely-wise and loving REASON for happening as it does and we ought to trust in that, even if we can't presently see or hope to understand it all.....but that assuredly we WILL, one day, when we go Home again.
And so, although you can see how much I disagreed with, on the flip-side, it was still good to read something that solidified my
own inner convictions, the same ones that I truly believe come from MY
real Self. The only trick, of course and always, is to keep these highly in mind as I mourn. That is, though, the harder part, naturally.

And of course there remains the utter frustration of knowing/believing as I do, yet STILL not being able to, even while I'm still here, go as far beyond these earthly trappings as I strive to, easily and at will.....at least not yet. And so I mourn, not only for the lack of physicalness that I know so well and do crave, but also for the still too firmly-rooted DISbelief that I
could transcend such disbeliefs with just
a little more effort. And there it is.....if I had someone around me who wasn't so opposed to the entire process in all its meanderings and complications, I might have an easier time of expending that "little more effort."